Zionist Manipulation of a Retention System
Once appointed, Indiana Supreme and Appellate judges only face a referendum, every ten years. Party affiliations are not listed on the ballot; the parties normally do not actively campaign or advertise about them; and most voters ignore them. It is very rare for a judge to be ousted in a referendum.
A recent example of the above mentioned manipulation occurred, when Steven David was up for his first referendum in 2012. He had angered many people in authoring an opinion, stripping away time honored rights protecting people from excessive concentrations of power, historically manifested in illegal arrests. In Barnes v State, he wrote “We believe however that a right to resist an unlawful police entry into a home is against public policy and is incompatible with modern Fourth Amendment jurisprudence.” Much narrower grounds were available.
In the Soviet Union before the death of Stalin, “counter-revolutionary” activity or speech was subject to summary execution, and “anti-semitism” was deemed “counter-revolutionary.” The pivotal role of jews, in financing and leading the Bolsheviks and successors, was noted by Churchill and the US foreign service, Sever Plocker, Solzenitsen, Kruschev for the period as late as 1958, and others.
We have the same group behind the Nuremberg proceedings, described as a fraud by Chief Justice Harlan Fisk Stone of the US Supreme Court, and similarly by Sen Robt Taft, long time leader of the conservative wing of the Republican Party, and author of Taft-Hartley. JFK singled out Taft for standing up against the Nuremberg fraud, in Profiles in Courage. The tortured witnesses, bogus documents, etc –used to manufacture an essentially false narrative of victimhood, and make it easier to control outsiders–was addresssed by MIT grad Arthur Butz in The Hoax of the Twentieth Century. After 4 editions and half a million copies sold, Amazon has BANNED it, along with 70 or so other books that support Stone and Taft.
At about the same time, the Great Sedition Trials in the US put people like the Gentile Protective Association through considerable hardship, under the notorious Smith Act, though dismissed after several years, in 1946.
In 1963 and 64, we had aggressive corruption of the Warren Commission’s work by a heavily jewish staff (National Law Journal, and gentileassociation.org/JFK and The Warren Commission), after public execution of a president marked in writing by Ben Gurion, as a threat to Israel’s survival. Lee Harvey Oswald was held without a lawyer for 48 hours, until Jacob Rubenstein (changed to Ruby in 1948) could plug him in the police station, wiping out the best evidence of Oswald’s innocence. As pointed out by Sen Schweiker, the CIA helped to collapse the investigation “like a deck of cards” from the beginning. The CIA was and still is the siamese twin of the Mossad, as pointed out by Noam Chomsky, zionist Jay Cristol, and others.
Three years later, we had a wired Naval Board of Inquiry investigation of Israel’s brutal, serial attack on the essentially unarmed USS Liberty, with fighter jets, torpedo boats, and commandos. Casualties were 70%, and the evidence Israel knew exactly who they were attacking is overwhelming. Sailors were told that if they talked to their spouse or anyone else about it in the future, it would be “court martial, imprisonment, or worse.” Gentileassociation.org, id, USS Liberty
The same group was also behind the 9/11 false flag operation, and the disgraceful “proceedings” at Guantanamo, where Steven David was sheep- dipped, as they say.
As jews consolidate their domination of America’s power structure, anything that makes it easier to get a target into custody is a powerful tool. So when David was at risk in the referendum, here come appellate advocacy professor Shumm and the jewish owned Gannett Publishing, to the rescue. See Shumm’s “My View” opinion, showcased by the Star, and my stripped down response (which they at least did print!). Appendix 9 and 10.
In essence, 85% of state bar assoc members sat silent, during not one, but all four attempts to get survey responses, on retention of the sitting judges. Schumm omitted that information, and concluded “the vast majority of state bar members” were gung ho for retention of David and the others. The Star also endorsed David separately.
In May of 2013 David voted for disbarment over a flyer, which sharply criticized a long-standing pattern of exploitive behavior in the heavily jewish bankruptcy cartel, with historical and religious context, and a local example. The disciplinary commission had cleared the flyer altogether, before an influx of jews onto the commission’s executive committee. See Free Speech for Lawyers below.
Governor Daniels had commented publicly about all the pressure he was getting, to appoint David to the state supreme court. People need to look at who was pushing David, and what kind of a court they wanted.
A story about the suspension on which David voted appeared on p 3 of the Indy Star (App 7). However, the on line versions omitted all my comments, addressing free speech and the pattern in the bankruptcy courts. I could not get an explanation in 3 attempts. Think of the CIA/Mossad saturation of the media, and how including my comments would have undercut the negative branding. Beat up a rooster, scare the chickens.
David listed Andrew Soshnik as one of his three references, in applying to the court.
